Protocol drawn up on the basis of article K.3 of the Treaty on the European Union, on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests | Protocol on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests

European treaties [ European Union treaties | EU treaties | primary law | treaties of the European Union ]

interpret a treaty

interpretation of peace treaties opinion

Protocol, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office

Protocol drawn up on the basis of article K.3 of the Treaty on the European Union, on the interpretation, by way of preliminary rulings, by the Court of Justice of the European Communities of the Convention on the use of information technology for customs purposes

Treaty on European Union [ Draft Treaty on European Union | European Union Treaty | EU Treaty | Maastricht Treaty | TEU [acronym] Treaty of Maastricht ]

ECSC Treaty [ Paris Treaty | Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community ]

conduct and interpret EMGs | interpret nerve conduction tests | interpret electromyograms | interpret EMG

As we struggle to interpret treaties of 100 or 150 years ago in today's context, this treaty itself will not be the silver bullet to answer all future problems.

The government has, effectively, unilaterally interpreted treaty and taken steps to, in effect, extinguish the treaty and aboriginal rights of the Northlands and Sayisi Dene nations in order to draft a boundary for political purposes, recognizing it was not what was being presented by the Dene themselves; and to ensure that the land selections under the Nunavut Settlement Agreement negotiations process could proceed without legal complication.

3. Recalls that the level of transparency of the negotiations as well as many provisions of ACTA itself, have been a cause of controversy that this Parliament has dealt with repeatedly during all stages of the negotiation; underlines that in line with Article 218(10) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Parliament must be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure; takes the view that adequate transparency has not been ensured throughout the negotiations on ACTA; recognises that efforts to inform Parliament have been undertaken by the Commission,but regrets that the requirement of transparency has been construed very narrowly and only as a result of pressure by Parliament and civil society; em ...[+++]phasises that in line with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties when interpreting a treaty '[r]ecourse may be had to supplementary means of interpretation, including the preparatory work of the treaty and the circumstances of its conclusion' (Article 32); points out that not all of the preparatory work for ACTA is publicly available;

A. whereas Article IV of the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) states that nothing in that Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all Parties to that Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of that Treaty,